近期有三宗新聞受大眾關注，包括五區總辭、馬頭圍道唐樓倒塌事故，以及龔如心遺產爭奪官司。
龔如心爭產案昨日宣判，不出所料，華懋慈善基金獲勝。獲勝原因不難理解，俗話說「事有反常即為妖」，凡事去得太盡，違反了常理，失敗是必然的。
八卦心態下到法律參考系統找了官司的判詞原文來看，林文翰法官的第一句話很是發人心省，“The late Nina Wang [“Nina”] was the chairwoman of the Chinachem group and was one of the richest woman in Asia. But wealth cannot offer an answer to all the problems in life, particularly in the wake of the final rest that every human being has to face eventually”。
財富不能解決人生所有問題，即使家財萬貫也要經歷生老病死四個人生階段，不論是貧窮還是富裕，死後什麼也不能帶走。不擇手段以至不惜一切去追逐不屬於自己的財富，最後Suffer的不單是自己，受影響的還有家人及子女，值得嗎？
&&&&&&&&
13 則留言:
苦瓜兄太強了:小弟都只係睇左少少! XD
講正經,好多法律界朋友都同意e單係好"清楚"既案子:即係未打已經估到邊個贏(其實一半以上既都係有得估,只要唔係有嚴重失誤都大約估到),是當事人利令智昏想圖僥倖吧?
假如聰聰贏到呢單嘢，我諗香港嘅冤氣會更加重。
3百幾頁咁多, 雖然d字好大隻.
若老:
我未睇哂份判詞,只係咗頭幾頁,而且睇都只係為咗學英文,不過估唔到既係,原來林官寫既英文好好睇,用詞唔似d律師咁份哂高深.
Ebenezer兄:
我都係咁諗,呢單嘢完全扭曲做人既價值觀,如果咁都勝訴,就真係唔知講乜好.
hkeric兄:
d字既font size 好似係12. 三百幾頁咁多,寫書都得呀.
在 "明報" 看到這幾句, 林法官的說話很有意思, 而且發人深省.
苦瓜兄
你好有學知精神，敬佩。
電影大隻佬對白。
「萬般帶不走，唯有業隨身。」
Hi Bitterman,
Your blog is good channel for me to get to know more about the IA industry. Don't know it's appropriate or not, but would appreciate if you could offer me some advise.
I have worked for 1 of the big 4 for 2 yrs doing audit. Recently, I change job and joined the government as a Accountant.
At first, i was very happy about the offer - high pay, work life balance...3.5 months has passed. honestly speaking, i don't like the job, largely due to limited scope I can learn and the bureaucracy... still not very long i have worked in gov't, so i don't wanna make a decision at this moment. But i do have thinking about the IA jobs in the commercial world. Could u give me some advise? what preparation should i do?
wealth does not solve all problems, but it solves lots of them.
肥貓:
啊,原來明報有講!
鹿兄:
太過獎啦,其實我都只係八卦啫!
「萬般帶不走，唯有業隨身。」認同^^
Hi 匿名,
If you don't mind, would you send me an email at bittermelon2009@gmail.com to further discuss?
Hi shelle,
You are right. I'm not saying wealth is a bad thing. My point is that we should maintain our dignity and integrity when seeking wealth.
Hi Bitterman,
I'm the 匿名 above. have sent u an email titled "How to prepare for an IA career?" thanks so much for your quick response
老人,
既然輸多,大律師還去幫拖?又是$$$
反而想知有無中國人大律師幫手,在情,就唔好接,中國人忌諱這種道德問題
Faithtrust100
又是一常見的對法律誤解:
首先大栗子接case唔係為"幫拖"、更唔係接左就係認同當事人(當然為$倒是真的),而是要執行所有人 - 包括所謂"一睇就知佢有做過"既犯人享有接受公平審訊的機會:如果被公眾(或政府)認為一定有做過就唔駛審即判,閣下唔覺得更是恐怖麼?
所以大栗子公會亦有制定專業守則:當栗子轉介案子時(大栗子唔可以自行接客),若無特別理由絕不可拒絕,而自己、公眾以至政府覺得佢有做過唔係一個可以接受既理由:唔係要為壞人張目,而係接受公平審訊係所有人既基本權利。
廣告時間,苦瓜大王唔好介意! XD
本老頭的blog有幾篇講相關法律基本概念,請多多指教!
老人
多謝分享!今次真是公平的審訊！！！
苦瓜
有機會分享你如何學英文,以前,真唔識煲劇學習,不過,免費又好看,好以唔多
FAITHTRUST100
發佈留言